Modern pistols keep getting better, but there are still plenty of models that just can’t run clean no matter how much attention you give them. Some guns develop feeding problems right out of the box. Others fall apart once you put real round counts through them. And then there are pistols that look great on the shelf but simply weren’t built with the kind of reliability you need when things turn fast.
When a handgun misfeeds more than it fires, you stop trusting it. You start making excuses for it. And eventually, you move on. These are the pistols that never earned their keep at the range, no matter how hard shooters tried to make them work.
Kimber Solo
The Kimber Solo had all the makings of a great carry gun, but the reality was far different. It required specific high-pressure ammo to cycle, and even then, many shooters struggled with consistent feeding. The short slide stroke and tight tolerances made it extremely sensitive to anything less than perfect grip and perfect ammunition.
In real-world use, the Solo was unpredictable. Some magazines ran fine, while others caused nose-dives or partial feeds. You never felt like the gun settled into a rhythm. For a pistol intended for daily carry, that kind of inconsistency was a dealbreaker.
Taurus PT709 Slim
You see the PT709 pop up as a budget-friendly option, but reliability has always been a mixed bag. Many shooters experienced failures to feed within the first few magazines, especially with hollow-point ammunition. The feed ramp geometry and extractor tension seemed to vary wildly from gun to gun.
Some people had decent results after a break-in, but others never got the pistol to run right. Light, compact guns already have narrow margins for error, and the PT709 pushed that margin too far. It’s one of those pistols shooters eventually retire because they’re tired of clearing stoppages.
Kahr CW380
The CW380 is attractive because of its size, but its feeding reliability has frustrated a lot of people. Lightweight .380 pistols can be twitchy, but this one is especially picky with ammo and grip technique. Many users report repeated failures to feed with anything but specific ball loads.
The small slide mass and stiff springs make the gun unforgiving under stress. Unless you maintain a perfect grip and feed it carefully chosen ammunition, it tends to choke. It’s not the kind of pistol you want to depend on when things get fast or messy.
Remington RM380
While the RM380 has its fans, plenty of shooters have dealt with persistent feeding problems. The magazine lips and feed ramp design sometimes create an awkward presentation angle, leading to rounds stalling halfway into the chamber.
Even with practice and different ammo types, some guns never smooth out. It’s a pistol that can run well—but only after a lot of trial and error. Many shooters simply don’t want to babysit their carry gun to get basic reliability.
SCCY CPX-1
The CPX-1 has long been known for spotty reliability. The biggest issue is inconsistent feeding, often caused by the combination of stiff recoil springs and magazines that don’t always maintain consistent pressure. Hollow-points are especially problematic.
Some users put hundreds of rounds through theirs without issue, while others struggle from the first range session. When a design is that inconsistent from gun to gun, it becomes tough to trust. Most shooters want something they can grab and run, not something they have to troubleshoot every outing.
Kimber Micro 9 (Early Batches)
Early Micro 9 models had well-documented feeding issues. They often jammed on the first round from the magazine, especially with defensive hollow-points. The short-slide 1911 design has always been sensitive, and Kimber’s early production only made that more noticeable.
Although later models improved, those early problems stuck in people’s minds. If a pistol regularly nose-dives or gets hung up on the feed ramp, it’s tough to regain confidence. Many owners ended up swapping them out for more predictable compact 9mms.
Century Arms Canik Shark C
This clone-style pistol had some potential, but rough internal machining created real problems. Many shooters saw repeated failures to feed simply because the slide and feed ramp weren’t polished enough to allow smooth cycling.
Some owners were able to clean it up with gunsmithing work, but others gave up before going that far. A pistol shouldn’t need a full internal overhaul just to feed properly, and that reputation kept the Shark C from ever gaining traction.
Phoenix Arms HP22
The HP22 is popular because it’s cheap and easy to find, but feeding issues follow it everywhere. The magazines are inconsistent, the ammo sensitivity is extreme, and the small frame makes it prone to limp-wristing—even from experienced shooters.
When a .22 pistol struggles to feed basic copper-washed rounds, you end up spending more time clearing stoppages than shooting. For casual plinking it might be fine, but it’s nowhere close to dependable.
Bersa Thunder .380 (Certain Runs)
While many Bersa pistols run well, there were manufacturing periods where feeding issues were common. Magazines sometimes lacked consistent tension, and feed ramps weren’t always smooth enough for hollow-point loads.
If you get a good one, the Thunder can be reliable. But when you get one from those problematic batches, it feels like every other magazine hangs up. That kind of unpredictability keeps shooters wary of trusting it for serious use.
KelTec PF-9
The PF-9 is extremely lightweight, but that comes at the cost of reliability. The pistol has a reputation for frequent failures to feed, especially once it gets dirty or when shooting hotter defensive loads.
Its design doesn’t give the slide much mass to overcome rough cycling. Combine that with sharp recoil and a narrow grip, and the gun becomes difficult to keep running consistently. Many owners eventually retire it in favor of more stable compact 9mms.
Taurus PT111 G2 (Early Years)
While later G2 models improved dramatically, early versions had feeding issues that frustrated a lot of shooters. Magazine problems were common, and the pistols often struggled with certain hollow-points.
If everything lined up—ammo, grip, magazine tension—the gun could run. But too often, shooters dealt with constant small failures that added up. The platform has loyal fans, but those early hiccups left a mark.
SIG Mosquito
The Mosquito is notorious for feeding issues, even with “recommended” ammo. Its tight chamber, light slide, and ammunition sensitivity made it a constant challenge. Many owners spent more time experimenting with ammo than actually shooting.
You can sometimes tune a Mosquito to run acceptably, but it rarely becomes a gun you trust. Stovepipes, half-feeds, and dead triggers were all too common. For many shooters, it simply wasn’t worth the upkeep.
Walther P22 (Early Generations)
Early P22s had similar problems to the Mosquito. Hollow-points caused frequent misfeeds, and even round-nose bulk ammo wasn’t always reliable. The slide mass and feed geometry created issues that newer generations have largely fixed.
The early models, though, earned their reputation. When a pistol forces you to bring three ammo types to the range just to find what runs, you stop reaching for it.
Jimenez Arms JA Nine
These pistols are known for major reliability concerns, with feeding problems being near the top of the list. Magazine inconsistencies, rough internals, and weak extractors all combine to create a pistol that rarely runs a full magazine cleanly.
Most shooters who buy one end up learning quickly that low-cost doesn’t always equal value. The JA Nine is more likely to jam than fire, and that alone has made it one of the most avoided pistols on the market.
Lorcin L9MM
Lorcin pistols have a long history of feeding and cycling issues, often caused by loose tolerances and inconsistent manufacturing. The L9MM is no exception. Many shooters report frequent nose-dives, stovepipes, and failures to return to battery.
Even with careful maintenance, the gun struggles to perform consistently. When you’re clearing jams every few rounds, the fun disappears fast. Most shooters eventually move on and never look back.
Like The Avid Outdoorsman’s content? Be sure to follow us.
Here’s more from us:
