Information is for educational purposes. Obey all local laws and follow established firearm safety rules. Do not attempt illegal modifications.

A Reddit user said he was dealing with repeated trespassing on his private property in Pennsylvania and had finally gotten the same man on three different trail cameras. He was not talking about one vague image or one quick sighting near the property line. According to the post, it was the same guy showing up on three separate cameras, enough that the landowner no longer felt like he was dealing with guesswork or a possible mistake.

He came to Reddit with a pretty direct question: would a game warden actually do anything about it? That was really the center of the post. He already had the camera evidence. What he wanted to know was whether that was enough to get some kind of action, or whether he was still going to be stuck dealing with it himself while the same person kept coming back.

The comments told him to stop sitting on it and start making calls. Several people said that once the same trespasser is showing up on multiple trail cams, it is time to send everything to the Pennsylvania Game Commission. Others said that the value of trail-camera evidence is that it gives a game warden something concrete to work with instead of a landowner just saying somebody has been sneaking around the property. People also told him to keep everything documented, save the timestamps, and avoid chasing the guy down himself unless he absolutely had to.

A lot of the advice leaned toward letting the warden handle the next step instead of turning it into a face-to-face confrontation. The feeling in the thread was that once somebody has already shown he is willing to come onto private property more than once, there is no guarantee a direct meeting in the woods or near a parking area is going to stay calm. So the post turned into a pretty practical discussion about saving the evidence, keeping records, and deciding when repeated trespassing finally becomes enough to bring in the authorities instead of hoping it stops on its own.

The story itself was simple. A landowner had the same trespasser on three different trail cameras and wanted to know whether that was finally enough to get a game warden involved. By that point, he was clearly past wondering if the man had just crossed the line once by accident. He had repeated camera proof and was trying to figure out whether the next move was to report it immediately or keep gathering more evidence first.

What do you think — if you had the same trespasser on three trail cams, would you call the game warden right away, or wait until you had even more proof?

Original Reddit post: Trespassing on private PA

Similar Posts