When you spend time around rifles long enough, you start noticing which ones actually deserve to be in someone’s pack and which ones only look the part sitting on a shelf at the gun shop. A rifle that shoots a decent three-shot group at 50 yards doesn’t mean much once you start running it through real training sessions, different shooting positions, or longer strings where heat begins to matter. Some rifles hold up. Others loosen up, shift zero, or fall apart the moment you push them harder than a beginner’s bench rest. The rifles below have earned their reputations for being better left on display than put to work at the range.
Remington Model 597 (.22 LR)

The Remington 597 might look like a handy rimfire to bring along for training days, but frequent range sessions expose its biggest issues right away. The magazines are notoriously inconsistent, and many shooters deal with feeding problems once dirt or fouling builds up. If you’re practicing reloads, quick transitions, or longer strings of fire, those malfunctions become a constant interruption.
The action itself is sensitive to debris. A little wind-blown grit can make the bolt sluggish, and carbon buildup causes cycling issues far sooner than you’d experience with most other rimfires. The 597 can feel fine on a bench with slow fire, but push it into a real practice routine and the problems show up fast. It’s a rifle that behaves best when it stays clean—and that’s not what you want in a rimfire you’re training hard with.
Ruger American Ranch 7.62×39 (Early Stock Variants)

The Ruger American Ranch has become popular, but early 7.62×39 models suffered from stock flex that made them unpredictable at the range. If you shoot from sticks, a backpack, or prone with pressure on the forend, the flex can shift your point of impact. During sustained shooting, those shifts become even more obvious as heat changes the way the stock interacts with the barrel.
Magazine reliability was another pain point early on. The Mini-30 style magazines didn’t always feed smoothly, especially with steel-cased ammo. During training sessions where you’re running multiple magazines or drilling follow-up shots, that inconsistency turns the rifle into a distraction. Later versions improved dramatically, but the early Ranch rifles often felt like they needed aftermarket help before they were ready to leave the house.
Henry Single Shot (Centerfire)

Henry’s single-shot rifles look like classic workhorses, but extended range use quickly shows their limitations. The break-action design doesn’t handle high-volume shooting well. As the rifle heats up, brass can become sticky, making extraction slow and occasionally frustrating—something you don’t want when working through a long session.
The lightweight design also amplifies recoil, even in moderate calibers. When you’re practicing fundamentals or running repeated groups, that recoil can wear you down quicker than expected. Accuracy is usually fine for hunting distances, but the rifle isn’t built for the kind of consistent precision that range-focused shooters demand. It’s a fine piece for the woods, but not a rifle that thrives in the training environment.
Winchester Wildcat (.22 LR)

The Winchester Wildcat is a fun and lightweight plinker, but it doesn’t shine when you bring it into serious range work. The polymer receiver assembly and modular trigger group make maintenance easy, but they also introduce durability concerns when you start putting real volume through the gun. After a few hundred rounds, some shooters notice shift in point of impact or wobble in the rear sight assembly.
The action is also sensitive to ammo variations. Bulk-pack rounds that run fine in other rimfires can cause failures to cycle or inconsistent ejection in the Wildcat. If you’re running drills or shooting steel rapidly, those malfunctions break rhythm and slow you down. It’s a rifle that works well for casual plinking but isn’t built for repeated high-volume days at the range.
Savage Axis (First Generation)

The first-generation Savage Axis shows its limits quickly if you use it for serious range time. The stock is extremely flexible, which affects consistency in prone, sitting, or any position where you load into the forend. Even a little pressure can shift the point of impact several inches at distance.
The action doesn’t smooth out much with use and can feel rough during cycling drills. After extended strings, heat often reveals wandering accuracy. For a budget rifle that will fire a few rounds a year, it’s acceptable. But for a shooter who trains often and expects repeatable performance, the early Axis is better left in a gun rack than a range bag.
Remington 710

The Remington 710 has a long-standing reputation for being unreliable during extended range use. Its bolt can bind even under light fouling, and range sessions only make it worse as carbon builds up. The cheap polymer stock doesn’t hold consistent pressure, which means accuracy shifts every time you change shooting positions.
The factory optic packages many came with also struggled to stay zeroed. Rapid strings and heat only magnified the problem. If you’re using range time to improve fundamentals or test ammo, the 710 turns consistency into a challenge. It’s simply not designed for the kind of repetitive work most shooters put in.
Winchester Black Shadow

The Winchester Black Shadow looks rugged, but repeated range use reveals its weak spots. The injection-molded stock flexes enough to touch the barrel when you brace the rifle or load into a bipod, causing unpredictable point-of-impact changes. Shooters who practice from multiple positions will see that inconsistency quickly.
The finish doesn’t hold up well either. Solvent, cleaning, and basic handling can wear the bluing faster than expected, and moisture accelerates rust. For a rifle you’re pulling in and out of a case all year long, those issues become frustrating fast.
Marlin X7 (Late Production)

Late-production Marlin X7 rifles show machining shortcuts that impact range performance. Cycling roughens noticeably after carbon builds, and the bedding isn’t consistent enough to maintain accuracy under heat. A few strings of fire can cause the barrel to walk shots.
The synthetic stocks used in later runs don’t stay rigid, especially in high humidity or large temperature swings. If you train outdoors year-round, you’ll see the rifle’s accuracy drift in ways that don’t line up with your shooting fundamentals.
Thompson/Center Venture (Early Recall Models)

Before the recall corrections, early Venture rifles had reliability issues ranging from stock pressure to action roughness. Extended range use brought those issues to the surface fast. Heat and recoil could loosen screws or shift bedding, leading to wandering impacts.
Moisture played a role too. Early finish treatments wore quickly under cleaning solvents or rain, creating corrosion concerns. It wasn’t a rifle suited for serious, regular practice.
Savage 11 Trophy Hunter XP

The package scope is the biggest weakness on the Trophy Hunter XP models. Even though the barreled action can shoot well, the included optic rarely holds zero after repeated rounds. Range sessions highlight that flaw quickly.
The flexible synthetic stock adds another layer of inconsistency, especially when shooting prone or from uneven positions. This rifle can hunt just fine, but it’s not ideal for high-volume practice.
CVA Cascade (First Gen)

The first-generation Cascade has a decent action, but the stock doesn’t offer the rigidity needed for repeatable range work. Once the barrel heats up, the forend can flex into it, causing accuracy shifts.
Moisture also reveals finish problems. If you shoot in damp weather or clean frequently, small rust spots may show up earlier than expected. Later Cascades fixed most of these issues, but the early ones sit better on display.
Mossberg Patriot Walnut

The walnut-stocked Patriot rifles can swell noticeably with moisture, which affects the barrel channel and shifts your point of impact. During long range days or humid conditions, this becomes a frustrating problem.
Repeated recoil can also loosen bedding screws faster than you’d hope. Even if the rifle shoots well early in a session, accuracy can drift through the day. It’s a fine-looking rifle, but not one that thrives in consistent practice.
Browning A-Bolt Slug Gun Variants

Slug recoil beats rifles up fast, and some A-Bolt slug variants struggled to maintain zero during repeated range sessions. Heavy recoil cycles loosened screws and introduced bedding movement.
The gas sealing also wasn’t as robust as you’d want during rapid strings. For hunters firing a few rounds before season, it worked. For range-heavy shooters, not so much.
Ruger American (Early Mag Issues)

Early Ruger Americans often suffered from magazines that didn’t lock consistently—an issue that becomes apparent very quickly during any kind of training. Once the magazine pops loose, feeding issues follow.
Grit and dust also made early bolts feel sticky after a few sessions. Newer models fixed this, but the early guns feel more like budget placeholders than reliable practice partners.
Remington R-25

The R-25 looks tough but doesn’t hold up during sustained shooting. Heat causes accuracy drift, and the gas system becomes sluggish once carbon builds. If you run multiple magazines in a session, reliability fades.
Moisture sensitivity around the bolt and carrier group adds to the frustration. This is a rifle that looks the part—but only when it’s sitting still.
Like The Avid Outdoorsman’s content? Be sure to follow us.
Here’s more from us:
The worst deer rifles money can buy
Sidearms That Belong in the Safe — Not Your Belt
*This article was developed with AI-powered tools and has been carefully reviewed by our editors.
